Online Tests
Bored.
Bored.
The use of “one the one hand” and “on the other hand” typically indicates a statement that has two differing, if not opposing, points. However, King George and the Bush, Inc. press machine expertly use these expressions to appear like they’re presenting two sides of a story, when in fact they’re doing nothing of the sort.
For example, Bush said today:
“On the one hand, we’re making progress when it comes to training Iraqis to take the fight to the enemy, we’re bringing the enemy to justice, we’re on the offense. On the other hand, democracy is moving forward in a part of the world that is so desperate for democracy and so desperate for freedom.”
See how the misuse of these expressions gives the appearance that he’s giving us the good with the bad? In fact, all he said was: On the one hand things are rosy and on the other hand, things are rosy too. Brilliant and terrible at the same time.
Last weekend I was talking to one of my roommates about religions. I happened to mention that the “Mormons” weren’t actually called Mormons, but instead refer to themselves as “Latter Day Saints.” In fact, their church is called the Church of Latter Day Saints. Their addition to the Bible is called The Book of Mormon.
“So why aren’t they just Mormons then,” my roommate asked. I responded that we don’t call those that read the Koran the Koranese, or people who believe in the stories of the Bible as Biblicans. “Ha! Biblicans! That’s a good one,” my roommate noted.
I decided that I would refer to Christians as Biblicans. Then another one popped into my head: Rebiblicans. The religious zealots who have assumed political power and seek to impose their religious values through the government are hereby known as Rebiblicans. (synonym: Christianist)
Note: I did a quick Google search and found that a handful of chat forum users are using the term Rebiblican too. I guess I wasn’t the first, even if the idea was original to me. This blogger uses the term rather appropriately:
…the power crazed Rebiblican moral values phonies tried to steamroll [legislation] through the House.

AaronB asked me today to blog the monopolization of the word “shrill” by conservatives. He says, “Everywhere I turn I hear conservative bloggers/pundits referring to allegedly ‘liberal’ media/pols as shrill when they do things like show concern for the poor in New Orleans.”
So, I thought I’d look into it. Here are some examples I found by typing in “shrill” and “shrill liberal” into Google News:
Shrill accusations of Bush lying: the Rutland, VT Herald - 8/31/05
But it’s a free country. And so these individuals are welcome to continue to shriek in shrill tones at the top of their lungs that “Bush is a liar!”
Hurricane Katrina: Liberal Politics Kill: ChronWatch - 9/9/05
The shriekers of the mainstream media and the liberal left must have stopped by the “unlooted” stores of their hometowns for brand new batteries for the bullhorns because the hate-Bush, “let’s blame him for everything” crowd is more shrill than ever.
Hurricane Katrina: A Post Mortem: ChronWatch - 9/11/05
Unfortunately, as with any disaster, there are the shrill wails demanding answers to how this could happen and who is to blame.
Grilling of Roberts widely seen as prelude to 2nd Bush nominee: San Jose Mercury News - 9/11/05
Conservative groups defend President Bush’s first Supreme Court nominee as a principled jurist who understands the limited role of the courts, and predicted liberal efforts to discredit him will fail.
“The more shrill and hysterical they get, the more they isolate themselves,” said Sean Rushton, executive director of the pro-Roberts Committee For Justice.
Liberals, pick another battle: LA Times - 9/17/05
By waxing hysterical about Bush’s surprisingly non-horrendous court choice, liberal interest groups are only playing into the hands of the GOP right, which is always eager for opportunities to paint liberals as shrill, negative and out of touch with mainstream America.
New Orleans: The Follies of the Great Society: FrontPageMag.com - 9/19/05
The shrill demagoguery from the Angry Left will increase, and the Democratic Party may lurch even further to the left as its leadership clutches more desperately to the power they sense is eroding.
Letters: Vigil mom a shrill shill for liberals: Corvalis Gazette-Times - 9/20/05
Liberals desperately want to make St. Cindy their symbol for the revival of a popular wide spread anti-war movement, but like their causes, they picked the wrong person. Either that, or she’s the true reflection of what the left has become: shrill, strident and narcissistic.
Democratic Party wagged by shrill tail: Miami Herald - 9/20/05
[Sheehan] is symptomatic of something that in 2008 could cause the Democratic Party a sixth loss in eight presidential elections. That something is a shrillness unlike anything heard, in living memory, from a major tendency within a major party.
Sure enough, shrill is being used to describe liberal opposition to Bush, Inc. It’s almost as if the Neocon think-tanks distributed their new list of talking points and vocabulary lists, and shrill was at the top of the list. Bleeding-heart liberal used to be the derogatory term in fashion. It would appear that shrill is the newest neocon fad. It certainly paints the left in a weak, annoying, and combative light. My guess is this is especially important with the 2006 mid-term election campaigns nearly upon us.
The one use of shrill that I found to be apropos was this one:
“Many readers find [Ann Coulter] shrill, bombastic, and mean-spirited. And those are the words used by readers who identified themselves as conservatives.” From an article on why the Arizona Daily Star dropped Coulter’s column.
Ann Coulter, now that’s shrill!
Recent conversations about the future model of False Profit governance led me to explore the following Wikipedia articles today:
Maybe Katrina will serve as a wake-up call, said Jonathan Freedland in the London Guardian. “It is conceivable that Americans will now call a halt to their quarter-centure experiment in limited government.” They cut away at social services until they created a whole underclass of undereducated indigents. They gutted federal disaster agencies. And here is the result: The rich and white are saved while the poor and black are left behind. This week has revealed America as no example for the rest of the world to follow. “When corpses float in the streets for five days,” the superpower is impotent. “When Sri Lanka offers to send emergency aid, the humiliation is complete.”
[via The Week]
Q: How does George Bush feel about Row versus Wade?
A: He doesn’t care how people get out of New Orleans.
Robert Reich wrote a great piece in the SF Chronicle today, in which he explores Bush, Inc.’s mastery of politics and failures at actual governance. Worth a read.
Bush wrote Condoleeza Rice a note about a pressing need while visiting the U.N. Bush was there to speak about continuing the war on terror, or fight against extremism, or whatever.
U.S.
The U.S. House of Representatives passed a hate crimes bill today, extending protection from discrimination to gays, lesbians, and transgendered peoples. [via Yahoo News and 365Gay.com]
Massachusetts
In a joint session today, Massachusetts House and Senate rejected a bill that would have amended to state constitution to ban gay marriage. The bill narrowly passed last year, but failed this year by 157-39. An amendment requires a passing vote in two successive sessions of the state legislature. [via 365Gay.com]
California
Governor Schwarzenegger will meet with LGBT leaders next week to discuss his decision to veto the Marriage Equality legislation passed by the California Legislature last week. The legislature decided to delay sending the bill to the governor, known as the ‘12 Days of Equality’ project. During this time they had hoped marriage equality supporters would make their voices heard. This meeting between Gov. Schwarzenegger and the LGBT leaders is a step in a positive direction. [via 365Gay.com]
Also in the Golden State, Ted Lieu, an open supporter of gay rights and marriage equality, won a special election for the State Assembly seat for Torrance, CA. [via 365Gay.com]
Part 1:
I stopped in at the Newstand near my work today to buy some good political magazines. As I explored the store, I picked up Adbusters, Instinct, Reason, The American Prospect, The Progressive, and two issues of The American Conservative.
What distressed me about my experience in the store today, was that the shop-keeper lady was being incredibly negative about a bunch of kids just outside the open doors. The kids were African American, maybe 16-ish, and being very boisterous. But, aside from the noise, I couldn’t pinpoint anything they were doing wrong.
This Onion-style article had me laughing pretty hard:
WASHINGTON, DC—President Bush is encouraging members of Congress not to delay in their efforts to improve the fortunes of some of the worst suffering Americans: those devastated by the estate tax. Mr. Bush said that repealing the tax could aid tens, even dozens of Americans. [more…]
[via The Swift Report]
Shaquille O’Neal has come to the rescue! The former basketball legend witnessed a man in a car yell anti-gay slurs at some passersby and then throw a bottle at them. Shaq followed the car and then hailed down a Miami Beach police officer. The suspect was apprehended and charged.
Go Shaq!
[via 365Gay.com]
Robert Scheer wrote a piece yesterday called The real costs of a culture of greed, in which he asserts that hurricane Katrina has exposed the economic consequences of the right’s greedy ways. The middle-class has suffered, while the poor have been “abandoned to their fate.”
Perhaps my favorite passage of his:
It is the result of a campaign by most Republicans and too many Democrats to systematically vilify the role of government in American life. Manipulative politicians have convinced lower- and middle-class whites that their own economic pains were caused by “quasi-socialist” government policies that aid only poor brown and black people — even as corporate profits and CEO salaries soared.
For decades, we have seen social services that benefit everyone — education, community policing, public health, environmental protections and infrastructure repair, and emergency services — in steady, steep decline in the face of tax cuts and rising military spending. But it is a false savings;…
I agree with Scheer that through swift talking and smoke screens, the right has convinced middle-class Americans that government is bad because it takes your hard-earned money away from you, while big business is your friend, and on your side. I so badly want to participate in the reversal of this misconception.
[via Working For Change]
Did Bush, Inc. just admit they screwed up? Did they then go on to take responsibility for their blunder? If so, it could very well be the first time they have admitted to failure, defeat, weakness, or incompetence. In a speech today CEO George Bush said:
“Katrina exposed serious problems in our response capability at all levels of government, and to the extent that the federal government didn’t fully do it’s job right, I take responsibility,” Bush said. “I want to know what went right and what went wrong.”
Fascinating.
[via Yahoo News]
[photo via AP]
Bill McKibben wrote an interesting piece in Grist Magazine in which he suggests hurricane Katrina is just the first of many weather-related catastrophes we will see. He says that as global warming continues, weather patterns will become more erratic. With the vanishing of a relatively stable global weather system, the climates our cultures have been built on for the last thousands of years will change, causing unimaginable disruptions to our societies as we have known them.
Update: I was delighted to see McKibben refer to Bush, Inc. as “our rulers.” Language like “ruler” and “politi-corporate management” are great ways to subtly frame the situation against King George.
Our rulers have insisted by both word and deed that the laws of physics and chemistry do not apply to us. That delusion will now start to vanish.
[via Grist Magazine]
AaronB sent me the link to this hilarious story, in which the author personifies The Government. Unicorns, pegasi, acid, the Goodship Lollipop. This one is definitely worth reading!
Jon Carroll wrote a brilliant piece on Intelligent Design in the SF Chronicle a few weeks ago. He attacks and deconstructs the premise that ID proponents hold: Scientific theories are initially ignored, then come under attack, and are eventually accepted.
Carroll accurately shows this to be a false account of the history of scientific theories. In fact Carroll uses a theory of his own to illustrate his point:
My idea, that fairies fly out of my mouth when I am sleeping and help the little children of the world, has been widely ignored. Some people say, “You have no proof,” despite the fact that little children by the millions are seeing their lives improved. Why? My fairies.
According to Richards, my idea will soon be attacked (”Why do you hate the little children of the world?” I will ask my attackers), and then, later on, it will be accepted. Probably the acceptance will be a posthumous kind of deal, and I won’t actually be around to see myself on a postage stamp. Me and one of my fairies, maybe.